Saturday 10 March 2012

Mastered in the Art of Finishing

Michael Bevan, Michael Hussey, Yuvraj Singh, Lance Klusener, MS Dhoni. Having a gaze at this list, one can easily comprehend the job at which they are at very best. Starting slowly, building the innings with minimum amount of risk and then ending up in their own style is the common algorithm what they follow.

The best finisher in the game has to know when to take the risk and when to minimize it. You must have the ability to rotate the strike and play the shots as well. You have to know how to absorb pressure in tight situations.

The extraordinary exploits of India's 'Captain Clobber' M.S.Dhoni with the bat in ODI cricket of late has raised the debate about whether he is indeed the best finisher in the game’s history. Watching Mahendra Singh Dhoni bat in a chase is a learning experience — the way he builds an innings; the way he calms the nerves of the other batsmen; the way he makes them contribute; the way he gives the opposition no chance at all. The template of his innings is normally a slow start as he settles in, lots of singles and then he builds to a crescendo.
Dhoni always has a lot of scoring options. He knows how to rotate the strike and at the same time is capable of hitting the big shots. He is very flexible in his approach and can stay calm at pressure situations. As soon as he entered the scene the calculator in his head starts working, the compass directed him to gaps, and his strong legs starts charging couples to complement the odd boundary in-between.

Starting his career as an unrefined slogger, he slowly transcended his batting style to being more responsible. This was a mature decision on his part and more responsible in keeping with his status as the skipper. You do not really see the rocket shots from his blade and super pacy innings these days. His 183* against srilanka, 148 against Pakistan were brilliant examples of what we call ‘Ball Bashing’. Completely agree that he cannot bat like the way he ravaged many oppositions in the yesteryears, since he is the anchor of the team. The Avatar of a slow and steady finisher suits him well. Picking the gaps, running hard and knowing the right moment - and place - to hit a boundary were the hallmarks of his success. It is this style of his game that made his name among the very best finishers in the ODI format. The Crowning Jewel in his ‘Taj’, the 91* in the World Cup 2011 final was reached in the same style.

It is becoming a hallmark for Indian cricket team, Dhoni using his unorthodox batting style with great effect and winning matches. It is becoming a regular scene, a helicopter shot, a wry smile, often suggesting – do not mess with me, I am a cool customer. He sometimes tends to be stuck in a rut and comes up with disasters occasionally. Well, you might say it is because he is the skipper and has to be responsible but in being responsible, he tends to go into a shell and misses scoring opportunities. There is one of those off days that he needs to be careful about where he messes up his reputation as a finisher. 

Many are dragging comparisons with Michael Bevan. No doubt, he plays crucial part in Australian team one-day outfit for a decade, especially when orchestrating calm chases in crises that often ended in last-over or last-ball heroics. However, Bevan and Dhoni have not played in the same era, which makes the comparison even difficult. I would say Greg Chappell’s grandma was a better batswoman than SRT. The point here is how can you compare batsman or for that matter cricketers from different eras? Different equipment, different playing conditions, different rules etc.

As of now, he is serving the team India with his uncanny ability to finish off the game with a flourish. Let us see if he ends up his career keeping his name at the top of the chart.

Tuesday 17 January 2012

All it needs is a meaningful Valedictory


India has produced many Batsmen’s ranging from the Legendary Veteran Sunil Gavaskar to Upcoming Star Virat Kohli. Among them Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman stand out not just because of their batting skills, but the impact they have had. 

India’s partly Dominance is gradually waning. India is currently on a horrendous streak of loses. There are innumerable reasons to specify. We have just not groomed new batting talent over the last decade and that is why the team is now getting moribund. It is only when Sachin decides to take a break or someone is injured, the likes of Chesteswara Pujara and Abhinav Mukundh come to the arena. It is impossible to develop yourself as a Test batsman if you are going to be in and out like that. India should gradually include new Blood to the current roster, who can serve in the long run. If India has to lose, it makes sense to lose with players who have a future than players whose best is far behind them. 

Almost Every series it seems as if it was their last tour, but they have all endured and touring again, driven not by divine power but by sheer desire and derive. Considering the emotional attachment to the ‘Big Three’, the process to replace them is not easy. Nevertheless, this painful step will have to be taken with the future of Indian cricket in mind.
 
As Dravid, Laxman and Tendulkar have orchestrated countless perfect innings; perhaps they can now work out how to script the perfect farewell. The recently drubbed tours of Australia and England will not diminish the luminance of their glorious careers. Every Indian is anticipating that these three to uncork the magic one last time.

It is important that the ‘Big Three’ are phased out gradually and not around the same time. The sudden absence of all will make India face a long period of readjustment. This will also ensure that at least one stalwart is present who could guide the youngsters drafted into the side. The Indian cricket needs to realize the importance of getting back that winning-cycle. One positive step towards attaining that cycle will be to infuse young blood in the side and groom them from the next series. With a number of home series lined up in the next two years, it would be easy to forget the humiliation abroad and go back to the familiar sight of our idolized middle order notching up century after century on flat tracks. Instead, we should let new talent develop just as we did in one-day cricket.